182.
The Committee considered a report which presented an amended Pavement
Licence Policy to it, and which requested that the amended Policy be approved.
Alison Chapman, Licensing Officer, attended the meeting to present the report and
assist the Committee with its enquiries. The Committee heard that the Council’s
Pavement Licence Policy had first come into force during the Coronavirus pandemic,
as a result of the implementation of the Business and Planning Act 2020 (the Act)
which aimed to encourage the use of outdoor facilities. The Act had been updated a
number of times, and it was considered appropriate to review the Council’s Policy in
the light of the most recent extension of the provisions within it.
The proposed amended Policy provided greater clarity for applicants, and included
more information to assist with the application process, including detailing the
requirement for the submission of suitable scale plans with applications. The
proposed Policy was written in such a way that it would no longer carry a
requirement to be reviewed annually, and would remain effective should the
provisions in the Act be extended further. The Committee was invited to approve the
proposed amended Policy for use.
A Committee member supported the proposed Policy, but wondered whether the
Council was being proportionate in the level of fees being charged? It was important
to try to encourage a café style culture in Colchester, could the fee charged for the
licence be related to the size of the business of the applicant? The Licensing Officer
confirmed to the Committee that the Act set a maximum fee of £100 for each
application for a pavement licence, whether the licence was to cover 1 chair or 20. It
was possible to apply for a pavement permit under the Highways Act, however, the
cost of such an application would be very significantly higher than the proposed £100
fee for a pavement licence, and it was hoped that the lesser fee would encourage
the safe culture which had been mentioned.
In discussion, the Committee supported the proposed Policy and accepted that £100
was not a large fee, although would potentially be more significant for a small
business. It wondered whether any consideration could be given to providing some
more flexibility in the fee which was charged based on the scale of the business
which was applying. Paul Donaghy, Licensing, Community Safety and Safeguarding
Manager, confirmed that the level of fee could be considered.
A Committee member asked about the safety of the furniture which would be placed
on the street, and sought assurance that adequate insurance would be provided by
the licence holder to indemnify the owner of the land on which furniture would be
placed. The Licensing officer confirmed that it was only possible for a pavement
licence to be issued on land controlled by Essex County Council as the Highway
Authority, and no licence would be issued on private owned land. Essex County
Council had raised the requirement for liability insurance up to £10m to ensure that
adequate cover was provided in the event of an accident.
A Committee member considered that the proposed fee of £100 was not significant,
however, did believe that the carrying out of an equality impact assessment (EIA)
would be helpful in relation to the proposed Policy to ensure that equality legislation
was being adequately supported. The Licensing, Community Safety and
Safeguarding Manager confirmed that he would undertake such an assessment.
In response to questions asked by a Committee member in relation to potential ease
of access issues associated with a pavement licence, it was confirmed to the
Committee that the Act provided that a minimum space had to be maintained
between any licenced area and the kerb, and that the Highway Authority was
consulted to ensure that sufficient space was available.
The Committee again discussed the fee associated with an application for a
pavement licence, and although opinions were divided as to the correct amount to be
charged, it was suggested that consideration be given to drawing a distinction
between larger and smaller businesses when setting the fee. It was, however, noted
that even the highest fee of £100 per year equated to approximately 30p a day,
which was not considered to be a high amount compared to the benefits that even a
single extra table outside could bring to a business. The Licensing, Community
Safety and Safeguarding Manager would consider whether there was any potential
to vary the fees which were charged.
RESOLVED that: the updated Pavement Licensing Policy be approved.