Decision Details

  • General
  • Reports

This section allows you to view the general details of a Decision

Details

Status:
Implemented
Title:
RMT and Greater Anglia
Details:

Proposer: Councillor T. Young

F.. This Council notes that;

There is a dispute between RMT and Greater Anglia Trains

Greater Anglia trains are owned by Abellio, who is jointly owned by the Dutch State Railway and the Japanese firm Mitsui

The dispute centres around union concerns that Greater Anglia is extending Driver Only Operation on the franchise as a result of introducing new trains

That RMT conductors have voted by 9-1 on a 90% turnout to take strike action and RMT drivers have also voted to take action. 

The RMT is concerned that Greater Anglia is removing the guarantee that there will continue to be a conductor on the services in question ‎and also removing the Conductor’s role in ensuring the safe despatch of trains.

That Abellio, when introducing new trains on their franchise in Scotland, were able to reach an agreement with RMT on ‎this issue which resulted in retaining the guarantee of the conductor on the services in question and also the conductor’s role in ensuring the safe despatch of trains.

This Council believes; 

That if Abellio in Scotland can reach an agreement in Scotland with the RMT on safe train despatch and keeping the guarantee of the conductors on new trains then Abellio can reach the same agreement with RMT in Greater Anglia 

That such an agreement would assist in protection of service, safety, security and accessibility for Greater Anglia passengers, including those residents of the borough that regularly use Greater Anglia services.

This Council calls on;

Greater Anglia to reach such an agreement as soon as possible 

The Government to allow and not block such an agreement. 

 

As the Motion relates to a non-executive matter it will be debated and determined at the meeting.

Implementation Date (not before):
Wed 1 Nov 2017
Implementation Date Notes:
Department:
Community & Living
Rating:
None
Include Item on Forward Plan:
No
Estimated Cost:
Unknown
Background Papers:
Is the Decision Maker Aware of the Decision:
Yes
Decision Type:
Committee
Decision Maker:
Council
Is the Head of Services Aware of the Decision:
Yes
Is a Key Decision:
No
Would the recommended decision be contrary to the budget and policy framework:
No
Decision Proposed:

Decision Criteria

This Decision does not contain any decision criteria records.

Wards

This Decision does not contain any Ward records.

Topics

This Decision does not contain any Topic records

Overview and Scrutiny

This Decision does not contain any Overview and Scrutiny records.

This section allows you to view the reports for the Decision.

Reports

The Decision does not contain any reports.

This section displays the history of the Decision.

Decision History

Date & Time CreatedUser Full NameStatus DescriptionDetails
1
 Page 1 of 1, items 1 to 9 of 9.
16/10/2017 13:48:57Richard CliffordBusiness Item Created 
16/10/2017 13:48:57Richard CliffordCommittee AddedCouncil
16/10/2017 13:48:57Richard CliffordMeeting Added01/11/2017 6:00PM
16/10/2017 13:49:49Richard CliffordStatus ChangedDecision Proposed [2]
16/10/2017 13:49:59Richard CliffordGeneral Details Edited 
17/10/2017 16:47:30Richard CliffordGeneral Details Edited 
18/10/2017 12:11:18Richard CliffordGeneral Details Edited 
14/11/2017 14:45:24Richard CliffordStatus ChangedImplemented [7]
14/12/2017 11:12:19Richard CliffordStatus ChangedImplemented [7]

Approval/Comments

No history found.